| 雪狸猫 写道: |
Iknowyou8 同学，I just notice that you have two sweethearts?
What's your babies' name? |
雪狸猫同学:
One is 17-40/F4, one is 50/1.4. and one is "那个臭名昭著的，垃圾狗头 75---300" with IS.
Is EF75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM so bad ?
You can read the reviews about it in many web sites, which show the very mixed comments.
What I like is its focal range, IS, weight, and the price.
Most of people like the xxb (70-200 f/4 L), but for me, it is no IS (I like it because I do not like to use the tripod at most of cases) and the 200 mm (320 mm for 10D) is too short for me shooting the birds. I like the xb IS (70-200 f/2.8L IS) but it is too expensive and a little bit heavy for a long time handhold.
I see a lots of very good pictures taken by using it, and so far the pictures I took look not so bad. I like it. The sample picture taken yesterday. No any PS but resize. using max aperture 5.6 and max tele focal length 300 mm( the worst case using it as the most reviews said ) and ISO 400.
海外华人
